I’ve recently hit a problem with deploying Ektron Extensions (the 8.0 replacement for Plugins), essentially every time my Extension ‘Strategy’ was called the workarea would display an error similar to:
Value cannot be null. Parameter name: type
Fortunately, in the Application Event log (for the CMS400 Source) there’s a bit more information:
1: Timestamp: 18/11/2010 18:43:01
2: Message: Could not load the MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring.UserMonitoringStrategy, MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring implementation from the configuration file
3: Category: Error
4: Priority: -1
5: EventId: 0
6: Severity: Error
This shows that the declaration in the web.config is correct:
1: <objectFactory>
2: <objectStrategies>
3: <add name="User">
4: <strategies>
5: <add name="UserMonitoringStrategy"
6: type="MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring.UserMonitoringStrategy, MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring"/>
7: </strategies>
8: </add>
9: </objectStrategies>
10: <objectImplementations>
11: </objectImplementations>
12: </objectFactory>
Fortunately, the next logged error reveals another vital clue:
1: Timestamp: 18/11/2010 18:43:22
2: Message: Exception thrown from: /WorkArea/login.aspx
3: Value cannot be null.
4: Parameter name: type at System.Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, Boolean nonPublic)
5: at Ektron.Cms.ObjectFactory.GetStrategyList[T](String objectName)
6: at Ektron.Cms.User.EkUser.get_StrategyList()
7: at Ektron.Cms.User.EkUser.OnBeforeLogin(UserData userData)
8: at Ektron.Cms.User.EkUser.logIn(String username, String Password, String ServerName, String Domain, String Protocol, Boolean autologin, AutoAddUserTypes AutoAddType, Boolean ForceLogin) at System.Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, Boolean nonPublic)
9: at Ektron.Cms.ObjectFactory.GetStrategyList[T](String objectName)
10: at Ektron.Cms.User.EkUser.get_StrategyList()
11: at Ektron.Cms.User.EkUser.OnBeforeLogin(UserData userData)
12: at Ektron.Cms.User.EkUser.logIn(String username, String Password, String ServerName, String Domain, String Protocol, Boolean autologin, AutoAddUserTypes AutoAddType, Boolean ForceLogin)
13: Last 1 events
14: [EventName]: [Timestamp] - ([UserID],[VisitorID])
15: OnBeforeUserLogin: 18/11/2010 18:43:01 - (0, b7461b16-72f8-4631-b180-29e128d87184)
16:
17: Category: Error
18: Priority: -1
19: EventId: 0
20: Severity: Error
The reference to ‘Activator’ means that the issue is the .Net cannot find the referenced strategy through the type description.
This is a bit puzzling as the declaration is correct, so I need a bit more information on what’s causing the problem and why I can’t see it in the log, so that means breaking out Reflector and digging into the API. Fortunately, the problem method (GetStrategyList<T>) is easy to find and fairly simple to understand. Here’s the code that’s failing:
1: try
2: {
3: type = Type.GetType(element2.Type, true);
4: }
5: catch (TypeLoadException)
6: {
7: EkException.WriteToEventLog(string.Format("Could not load the {0} implementation from the configuration file", element2.Type), EventLogEntryType.Error);
8: }
9: strategy = (T) Activator.CreateInstance(type);
Essentially, the first log entry is written in response to the actual problem (but doesn’t record it!) and the second, more detailed error is caused by the failure to assign the type variable.
What we really need to get hold of is the original TypeLoadException and capture the reason for the failure. There are two ways to do this:
- You could use the Visual Studio Exceptions dialog (Debug->Exceptions and check the ‘Thrown’ checkbox for System.TypeLoadException under ‘Common Language Runtime Exceptions) and use the debugger to inspect the error:
- Create a test bed report to reproduce the strategy loading procedure with an increased amount of logging
My first brush attempt was using Option 1, but I found that it was a bit unreliable and would be limited to debugging my development machine. The second option is more work, but is reusable and direct. My weapon of choice for this type of report is a custom HttpHandler which can be added/removed through a simple configuration change:
1: using System;
2: using System.Configuration;
3: using System.Web;
4: using global::Ektron.Cms;
5:
6: namespace MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensibilty
7: {
8: /// <summary>
9: /// Diagnostic handler to test loading Extensions
10: /// </summary>
11: public class ValidateStrategiesHandler : IHttpHandler
12: {
13:
14: /// <summary>
15: /// Enables processing of HTTP Web requests by a custom HttpHandler that implements the <see cref="T:System.Web.IHttpHandler"/> interface.
16: /// </summary>
17: /// <param name="context">An <see cref="T:System.Web.HttpContext"/> object that provides references to the intrinsic server objects (for example, Request, Response, Session, and Server) used to service HTTP requests.</param>
18: public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
19: {
20: context.Response.ContentType = "text/plain";
21: System.IO.TextWriter output = context.Response.Output;
22: output.WriteLine("Configured Extension Strategy Test\n");
23: ObjectFactorySection factorySection = (ObjectFactorySection)ConfigurationManager.GetSection("objectFactory");
24: foreach (ObjectStrategyConfigElement strategies in factorySection.ObjectStrategies)
25: {
26: output.WriteLine("{0} (found {1})", strategies.Name, strategies.Strategies.Count);
27: foreach (StrategyConfigElement strategy in strategies.Strategies)
28: {
29: RenderStrategyLoadingOutcome(output, strategy);
30: }
31: }
32: output.WriteLine("\nLoaded Assemblies");
33: foreach (System.Reflection.Assembly ass in System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies())
34: {
35: output.WriteLine(ass.FullName);
36: }
37:
38: }
39:
40: [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Performance", "CA1804:RemoveUnusedLocals", MessageId = "type")]
41: private void RenderStrategyLoadingOutcome(System.IO.TextWriter output, StrategyConfigElement strategy)
42: {
43: output.Write("\t{0,-20}\t{1,-40}\t", strategy.Name, strategy.Type);
44: try
45: {
46: Type type = Type.GetType(strategy.Type, true);
47: Type baseType = type.BaseType;
48: output.WriteLine("{0}\tOK!", baseType.Name);
49: }
50: catch (Exception tle)
51: {
52: output.WriteLine("Failed! ({0}:{1})", tle.GetType().Name, tle.Message);
53: System.Diagnostics.Trace.TraceError("Failed to Load Strategy '{0}'\n{1}", strategy.Type, tle.ToString());
54: }
55: }
56:
57: /// <summary>
58: /// Gets a value indicating whether another request can use the <see cref="T:System.Web.IHttpHandler"/> instance.
59: /// </summary>
60: /// <value></value>
61: /// <returns>true if the <see cref="T:System.Web.IHttpHandler"/> instance is reusable; otherwise, false.
62: /// </returns>
63: public bool IsReusable
64: {
65: // Return false in case your Managed Handler cannot be reused for another request.
66: // Usually this would be false in case you have some state information preserved per request.
67: get { return true; }
68: }
69: }
70: }
This can simply be registered in the system.webServer/handlers section of the web.config (assuming IIS 7 and Integrated Pipeline):
1: <add name="Verify Strategy Handler"
2: verb="GET"
3: path="secure/validatestrategies.ashx"
4: type="MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensibilty.ValidateStrategiesHandler"
5: preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv2.0" />
This report can now be called using /secure/validatestrategies.ashx">http://<website>/secure/validatestrategies.ashx and will render a report similar to:
1: Configured Extension Strategy Test
2:
3: Content (found 1)
4: LoggingStrategy MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensibilty.LoggingContentStrategy, MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron ContentStrategy OK!
5:
6: User (found 1)
7: UserMonitoringStrategy MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring.UserMonitoringStrategy, MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring Failed! (TypeLoadException:Could not load type MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring.UserMonitoringStrategy' from assembly MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring'.)
8:
9: Loaded Assemblies
10: ** Ommitted as there's hundreds **
With the full exception logged to Trace.
What the report immediately showed was that the Extensions that had worked were in assemblies that were listed in the ‘Loaded Assemblies’ report. The ones that failed weren’t.
This is odd as the library was definitely in the websites /bin folder, and a little more digging and investigation revealed that the one of the class libraries dependencies couldn’t be resolved correctly due to version number mismatch. When that was fixed, the Strategies were loaded as expected! Result.
1: Configured Extension Strategy Test
2:
3: Content (found 1)
4: LoggingStrategy MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensibilty.LoggingContentStrategy, MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron ContentStrategy OK!
5: User (found 1)
6: UserMonitoringStrategy MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring.UserMonitoringStrategy, MartinOnDotNet.Helpers.Ektron.Extensions.Monitoring UserStrategy OK!
7:
8: Loaded Assemblies
9: ** Ommitted as there's hundreds **
Hopefully, this report/test bench handler will help others with similar issues.
Well, the specifics are bit complicated. Essentially, I have a set of libraries that wrap the Ektron API which we build against the different versions of Ektron that we support (7.6.1->8.0.1). The idea is that we code against our library in a consitent manner and the library handles the different API implementations/workaround as required.
ReplyDeleteThere was a bug with our Automated Build process which meant this specific library was built against 7.6.1 not 8.0.1. So was dependent on previous versions assemblies (including EktronBase.dll which is used for the equivalent plugin functionality - which isn't deployed within the website).
The report that I implemented highlighted the versioning issue (as the assembly versions include the Ektron api version ie 1.801.XXXX.XXXX or 1.761.XXXX.XXXX).
However, the mismatched dependency issue would also apply for libraries that were dependent on different versions of 3rd Party library.
There are a lot of other causes for this type of failure and the only way to determine the appropriate fix is to inspect the exception detail.
Very Good Article
ReplyDelete